Hospital Imaging Performance: How Health Systems Can Improve Access, Capacity and Cost
Hospital imaging performance is determined by much more than the number of scanners a health system owns.
Patient access, scheduling, workforce capacity, modality utilization, radiologist coverage, equipment, technology, vendor agreements and outpatient strategy all influence how effectively an imaging service line performs.
When those systems are aligned, hospitals can often create more usable capacity, improve patient access, reduce avoidable cost and strengthen imaging revenue without simply adding staff, equipment or capital.
DCCS Consulting works inside hospital Radiology and Imaging systems to improve the operational drivers behind access, throughput, cost, revenue and margin.
The objective is straightforward: get more performance from the imaging resources the hospital already has—and make better decisions about where additional resources are truly needed.
Imaging Is a Hospital Performance System
Radiology does not operate in isolation.
Imaging supports clinical decisions across the Emergency Department, inpatient units, surgery, orthopedics, oncology, cardiology, neurology and physician practices. When imaging access or workflow becomes constrained, the effects can extend across the hospital.
But the source of the constraint is not always obvious.
An MRI access problem may appear to require another scanner when the actual constraint is staffing, scheduling, operating hours or authorization.
High imaging expense may appear to be a supply problem when equipment agreements, service contracts or utilization are driving the cost.
Slow report turnaround may appear to be a radiologist productivity issue when physician coverage, subspecialty availability or workflow is misaligned with demand.
Improving imaging performance requires understanding those relationships as one operating system:
Demand → access → staffing → workflow → modality utilization → radiologist coverage → technology → cost and revenue → hospital performance
That changes the question from "What does Radiology need?" to:
What is preventing the imaging system from performing at its full potential?
Improve Imaging Capacity Before Simply Adding Resources
When MRI, CT or other imaging access becomes constrained, additional equipment may eventually be necessary.
But installed equipment capacity and effective imaging capacity are not the same thing.
Hospitals need to understand demand and utilization by modality, location, operating hour and patient population before determining whether additional capital is the answer.
Shea Soll, MBA, brings experience across hospital and outpatient imaging operations, including MRI, CT, PET, nuclear medicine, ultrasound and women's imaging, as well as equipment procurement, patient access, scheduling, staffing models and facility development.
In one DCCS imaging engagement, MRI and ultrasound capacity modeling projected that the hospital department would come within approximately 4% of capacity within three years. The analysis supported planning for a second MRI system while also addressing staffing, operating hours, scheduling, insurance verification, equipment and service configuration.
The operating principle is important:
Capital planning should follow an understanding of imaging operations—not substitute for it.
Align Imaging Workforce With Demand and Workflow
Imaging workforce shortages can create real capacity constraints.
But determining the appropriate workforce requires more than counting vacancies or comparing FTEs against a historical budget.
Staffing should be evaluated against modality demand, operating hours, patient flow, equipment utilization and the services the department is expected to support.
Connie Burke, MBA, BSRT(R)(MR), MRSO, MRSC™, brings both frontline clinical imaging experience and senior imaging operations leadership.
Her experience includes responsibility for more than 120 FTEs across radiology, breast imaging, MRI, CT, nuclear medicine, PET/CT, ultrasound and patient transport in a 700+ bed academic Level I trauma environment performing more than 225,000 imaging procedures annually. Her performance initiatives included developing an optimized staffing matrix that reduced approximately 10 FTEs, reducing duplicate CT scans by approximately 90%, managing labor within established targets and improving outpatient patient satisfaction.
The objective is not simply reducing labor. It is matching resources to the work:
Right staffing + right modality + right operating hours + efficient workflow = greater effective capacity
Recover Capacity Already Inside the Imaging System
Not every capacity problem requires creating new capacity.
Hospitals may be able to recover capacity already inside the imaging operation.
Duplicate studies, avoidable utilization, scheduling gaps, inefficient patient movement, inconsistent ordering practices and poorly configured workflows can consume equipment and workforce resources without creating additional clinical value.
Burke's imaging leadership included developing criteria to reduce inpatient MRI utilization and initiatives that reduced duplicate CT scans by approximately 90%.
The operational sequence becomes:
Reduce avoidable utilization → release existing capacity → improve access → better target future capital investment
That is fundamentally different from assuming every access problem requires more equipment or labor.
Patient Access Is Part of Imaging Operations
A scanner can technically have available capacity while patients still wait for appointments.
That is because imaging access begins before the patient reaches the scanner.
Scheduling, insurance verification, prior authorization, referral management, registration, patient preparation and communication all determine whether theoretical capacity becomes usable capacity.
Soll's DCCS imaging work has included dedicated radiology scheduling and insurance verification functions, staffing models, patient-flow recommendations and outpatient imaging-center development.
In a DCCS engagement involving development of a freestanding outpatient imaging center, the work extended across equipment and design, staffing and credentialing, patient flow and scheduling, PACS and IT infrastructure, pro forma and break-even analysis, accreditation, revenue cycle, patient experience and referral strategy.
That is why imaging access should not be treated simply as a scheduling issue.
It is an operating-system issue.
Radiologist Alignment Is a Capacity Issue
Imaging capacity does not end when the scan is complete.
Hospitals also need sufficient physician capacity to interpret studies accurately and efficiently.
Radiologist staffing, subspecialty availability, overnight coverage, productivity, turnaround expectations, professional-service agreements and physician alignment can all influence the performance of the imaging system.
Jonathan Pine, MBA, Principal of DCCS Radiology Advisory Services, brings extensive experience in hospital and physician-practice contracting, radiologist staffing and benchmarking, physician employment models, joint ventures, imaging-center development, P&L improvement, workflow, clinical protocols and enterprise PACS/RIS strategy.
His leadership experience has included a regional radiology operation involving more than 150 physicians and advanced practice providers, 550 staff, 12 joint-venture imaging centers and 16 hospital partners.
At DCCS, Pine has also worked with radiology practices on the cost of services provided to hospitals and the development of hospital support, stipend and contracting strategies.
The question for hospital leadership becomes:
Does radiologist coverage match the imaging system the hospital is trying to operate?
Adding technical capacity without addressing professional capacity can simply move the bottleneck.
Get More Value From Imaging Contracts, Vendors and Capital
Improving imaging performance also requires examining what the hospital is buying, what it is paying for and whether existing agreements still support the operating model.
Imaging sits at the intersection of significant capital equipment, maintenance and service agreements, PACS/RIS technology, outsourced services, radiologist contracts and payer reimbursement.
These are not simply purchasing decisions. They are operating decisions with financial consequences.
Pine's experience includes hospital and physician contracting, managed-care agreements, joint ventures and capital equipment decisions. In one regional radiology leadership role, renegotiated hospital contracts generated more than $2 million in additional revenue while reducing costs by more than $1 million.
Soll brings complementary expertise in equipment evaluation, vendor selection and procurement, third-party contracting and payer relationships. His imaging work has included equipment and vendor comparisons, procurement, pro forma analysis and break-even modeling.
Burke provides the clinical and operational perspective required to determine whether technology and equipment decisions actually support imaging workflow. Her experience includes imaging-equipment selection, PACS/RIS vendor evaluation and implementation, billing systems, accreditation, regulatory requirements and financial forecasting.
The goal is not simply: "Can we negotiate a lower price?"
The stronger question is:
What does the imaging system actually need, and how should equipment, vendors, physician agreements and technology support it?
Better vendor agreements can reduce avoidable operating cost. Better equipment decisions can improve utilization of capital. Better radiologist agreements can strengthen coverage and service performance. Better reimbursement strategy can increase the value of existing imaging volume.
The negotiation becomes more effective because it begins with an understanding of the operation.
Technology Should Remove Friction From Imaging
Hospitals continue to invest in imaging equipment, PACS, RIS, artificial intelligence and other technologies.
Technology alone does not create imaging performance. Its value depends on what happens to the operating system around it.
Burke has led imaging equipment replacement and implementation initiatives involving Epic, voice recognition, PACS, digital radiography, MRI and CT technology.
Pine's experience includes enterprise PACS implementation and workflow redesign across multi-site imaging operations.
Soll's imaging advisory work includes PACS and IT infrastructure, equipment evaluation, vendor comparison and facility planning.
Technology decisions should therefore be evaluated against the complete imaging pathway:
Order → authorization → scheduling → registration → imaging → interpretation → result
The question is not whether the hospital has the newest technology. It is whether the technology improves access, workflow, quality, capacity or cost.
Outpatient Imaging Can Become a Growth Strategy
Improving imaging productivity is not solely a cost strategy. It can also create capacity for growth.
Pine's health-system imaging leadership included outpatient volume increases of 10% in CT, 8% in MRI, 11% in ultrasound, 14% in mammography, 11% in nuclear medicine and 9% in PET, while the Medical Imaging division's outpatient contribution margin increased 7%.
In another hospital leadership role, Pine increased the Radiology service line operating margin by $2.1 million while advancing an outpatient radiology strategy.
His earlier leadership of a large imaging organization included growth in annual imaging volume from approximately 600,000 to 1 million exams, an increase in annual EBITDA of $5 million to more than $14 million, and initiatives and acquisitions that generated more than $9 million in additional imaging-center revenue.
The connection matters:
Better access → greater available capacity → stronger referral retention → outpatient growth → improved service-line financial performance
Efficiency and growth are not competing imaging strategies.
When the operating system performs better, hospitals can create room for both.
From Imaging Advisory to Embedded Leadership
Some hospitals need a focused assessment of imaging capacity, contracts, technology or outpatient strategy. Others need experienced leadership working directly inside the service line.
DCCS can support both.
Radiology and Imaging advisory work can address specific performance issues such as capacity planning, workforce models, physician alignment, vendor strategy, PACS/RIS, outpatient development or financial performance.
When a hospital has a leadership gap or needs additional operating capacity to advance a priority initiative, DCCS can also deploy experienced imaging leadership alongside the existing hospital team.
Embedded leadership is not a staffing solution disconnected from performance.
It is a targeted operating capability designed to stabilize the service line, advance priority initiatives and strengthen long-term performance and leadership continuity.
Leadership deployment → imaging system stabilization → operational improvement → financial outcome
When Should Hospitals Reassess Imaging Performance?
Hospitals and health systems may benefit from a deeper Radiology and Imaging performance review when:
MRI, CT or other advanced imaging wait times are increasing
scanners appear full while outpatient growth has stalled
equipment replacement or expansion is being considered
staffing shortages are limiting operating hours
labor expense is increasing faster than imaging volume
outpatient referrals are leaving the system
authorization or scheduling delays are affecting access
duplicate or avoidable utilization is consuming capacity
inpatient imaging delays are affecting patient flow
radiologist coverage or report turnaround is inconsistent
professional-service agreements need to be renegotiated
equipment, technology or vendor contracts are approaching renewal
imaging operations vary significantly across hospitals or locations
a new outpatient imaging center is being considered
imaging margin is declining despite strong demand
These conditions should not automatically trigger an isolated solution.
A staffing problem may require workflow redesign. A capacity problem may require utilization improvement. A cost problem may require contract renegotiation. A growth problem may require better patient access. An equipment decision may require understanding all of them.
Imaging Improvement Has Enterprise Impact
Radiology touches nearly every major clinical service line.
That means an imaging constraint can become a hospital constraint.
Delayed imaging → delayed clinical decisions
Limited MRI or CT access → longer waits and potential referral leakage
Misaligned staffing → unused equipment capacity or unnecessary labor expense
Avoidable utilization → capacity consumed without additional clinical value
Radiologist coverage gaps → delayed interpretation
Poor vendor economics → higher service-line cost
Underused outpatient capacity → lost revenue opportunity
The reverse is also true.
Better access → greater clinical availability
Better workflow → stronger throughput
Better utilization → more usable capacity
Better staffing alignment → improved productivity
Better contracts → stronger cost and revenue performance
Better outpatient capacity → growth opportunity
This is how imaging performance becomes hospital financial performance.
Clinical and operational improvement inside the imaging system creates the changes in capacity, productivity, cost and revenue that ultimately improve margin.
Get More Performance From Your Imaging System
Hospitals cannot solve every imaging challenge by adding people, equipment or capital.
They can determine whether the resources already committed to Radiology are producing the access, capacity, quality and financial performance they should.
DCCS Radiology & Imaging Advisory Services works alongside hospital leadership across patient access, workforce deployment, modality utilization, radiologist alignment, equipment, technology, vendor agreements, outpatient strategy and service-line financial performance.
The objective is not simply to do more with less.
It is to get more clinical, operational and financial performance from the imaging resources the hospital already has—and make better decisions about where additional resources are truly needed.
Comments